Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
No Result
View All Result
shutterstock_Royal Courts of Justice

Former Jones Day partner is fined by UK judge for telling client to delete secure messaging app

Injury Insiders by Injury Insiders
October 6, 2022
in Premises Liability
0

[ad_1]

  1. Home
  2. Daily News
  3. Former Jones Day partner is fined by UK judge…

Ethics

Former Jones Day partner is fined by UK judge for telling client to delete secure messaging app

By Debra Cassens Weiss

October 6, 2022, 12:58 pm CDT

shutterstock_Royal Courts of Justice

The Royal Courts of Justice in London houses the High Court and Court of Appeal of England and Wales. Photo from Shutterstock.

A London judge has fined a former Jones Day partner about $28,000 after finding him in contempt of court for telling a client’s business to delete a secure messaging app.

British High Court Judge Adam Johnson in the United Kingdom ordered the fine Wednesday but rejected prison time for former partner Raymond John McKeeve, report Law360, Reuters and Law.com International.

McKeeve had told an IT person working for the client to “burn” the 3CX secure messaging app after learning of a search order, according to prior coverage by Law360. The client was Jonathan Faiman, a co-founder of Ocado, a British online grocery business.

Ocado obtained the search order in a dispute with Faiman over his creation of a rival online delivery business with another former Ocado executive, Jonathan Hillary. Ocado had claimed that the two men were using its confidential information.

The destruction of the app prevented material on the app from being searched, according to Johnson’s judgment.

According to Law.com International, McKeeve left Jones Day in 2020 after seven years with the law firm. He said in June he ordered the destruction of the evidence because of “super heightened anxiety” after his wife was subjected to “vitriolic” press attention because of her appointment as a Brexit party member of the European Parliament.

According to prior coverage by Law360 here and here, McKeeve told the court in June that Hillary had used the name of McKeeve’s wife as a pseudonym in their communications. McKeeve said he panicked when he realized that a phone would be seized with his wife listed as a contact, and he didn’t want to drag her into the litigation.



[ad_2]

You might also like

Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, May 16

Announcement of opinions for Wednesday, April 17

April 17, 2024
501940

Bet Gordon Ramsey Feels Like An Idiot Sandwich For Letting This Happen To His Pub

April 16, 2024
Injury Insiders

Injury Insiders

Next Post
Judge James Ho Jim Ho

After James Ho Boycott, Another Conservative Judge Responds: Great, More Yale Clerks For Me!

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.