Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
No Result
View All Result
Senate Holds Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings For Ketanji Brown Jackson

You Have To Check Out This Epic Supreme Court Jeopardy! Fail

Injury Insiders by Injury Insiders
November 10, 2022
in Premises Liability
0

[ad_1]

Senate Holds Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings For Ketanji Brown Jackson

(Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

If you’ve ever wondered if you’re smarter than three Jeopardy! contestants — in the Tournament of Champions, no less — the answer is yes. Yes, you are. This isn’t some affirmation bullshit (though you *are* good enough, smart enough, and doggone it, people like you), but based on evidence from last night’s episode of the syndicated game show.

You might also like

Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, May 16

Announcement of opinions for Wednesday, April 17

April 17, 2024
501940

Bet Gordon Ramsey Feels Like An Idiot Sandwich For Letting This Happen To His Pub

April 16, 2024

Because in the ToC, the contestants were asked this incredibly easy question that anyone who follows the Supreme Court or politics or even just current events should 100% know. And yet, not a single contestant — Amy Schneider, Tyler Rhode, and Maureen O’Neil appeared on the episode — rang in.

I don’t understand why this is so tough for the contestants — it’s not like they asked them to spell Ketanji (not that the spelling is particularly difficult).

Excuses for this epic fail abound, with some speculating that, given the category “3-Named People,” contestants didn’t know the “Brown” in Ketanji Brown Jackson. Or that the legal world is in its own isolated bubble, or that they assumed the first Black woman on the Court must have happened longer ago. All of which strikes me as some pretty weak sauce.

At least one of the contestants apologized for the gaff.

That triple stumper stung, but with the category being “Three Named People”, you usually have to list all three names – after the game, Amy, Maureen and I discussed that we all could pull 2 of the 3… not good enough – sorry Justice Jackson! #Jeopardy #JeopardyToC

— Tyler Rhode (@tylerthinksthis) November 10, 2022

The episode also featured another Supreme Court triple stumper (though not as egregious the KBJ brain fart). No one was able to answer in the category Supreme Court case, “Dobbs v. this city’s Women’s Health Organization overturned Roe v. Wade.” Which everyone reading Above the Law — or following the midterm elections — knows is Jackson, Mississippi.

I guess “Jackson” just proved too difficult to remember for this question too.


Kathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, host of The Jabot podcast, and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter (@Kathryn1).



[ad_2]

Injury Insiders

Injury Insiders

Next Post
California Headlight Laws and Penalties

California Headlight Laws and Penalties

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.