Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
No Result
View All Result
Curse

‘But My Dead Husband’s Black’ Not An Excuse To Drop The N-Word In Court

Injury Insiders by Injury Insiders
January 10, 2023
in Premises Liability
0

[ad_1]

Curse

(Image via Getty)

Chicago attorney Donna Makowski has joined the long line of folks in the legal system who can’t figure out the intricacies of online court appearances. But in Makowski’s case rather than a cute cat filter, observers were treated to obscenities and racial slurs. Delightful.

You might also like

Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, May 16

Announcement of opinions for Wednesday, April 17

April 17, 2024
501940

Bet Gordon Ramsey Feels Like An Idiot Sandwich For Letting This Happen To His Pub

April 16, 2024

Last week, during a Zoom court hearing, Makowski was unable to master the mute button and participants in the call — including Judge Dominique Ross, a Black woman — were treated to a barrage of inappropriate language. As reported by the Chicago Sun-Times:

Donna Makowski apparently was referring to personnel with the Cook County sheriff’s office when she said “those motherf*****rs.” She also used the N-word, according to court records.

The following day, Judge Ross scheduled a contempt hearing. At that hearing, Makowski apologized for the “inexcusable episode,” saying “I’m shaken and I’m humiliated.” Makowski also sought to assure the court the hurtful slur was not directed at the judge. A poor excuse — and not the only one — that the judge was having exactly none of:

“It was outrageous, whether you were directing it to the court or not,” the judge replied. “I’m sure that you have clients who are people of color. “

“My husband was,” Makowski said. “My deceased husband.”

“That does not give anybody a pass to make those types of statements,” the judge said. “They’re just not proper.”

Ultimately, however, Judge Ross found contempt of court was not a proper punishment “because the court cannot teach adults not to make ignorant statements, to make racial slurs, whether they are directed at the court or not.

“There is no punishment that this court can impose upon you that is going to surpass the embarrassment, the humiliation that your colleagues and other judges have heard you make. Your apology is accepted.”

…But Judge Ross *will* be referring the matter to the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission.


Kathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, host of The Jabot podcast, and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter @Kathryn1 or Mastodon @Kathryn1@mastodon.social.



[ad_2]

Injury Insiders

Injury Insiders

Next Post
zara sues copyright

Zara Sues Los Angeles-Based Brand Thilikó for 'Serial' Copyright Infringement

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.