Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
No Result
View All Result
Supreme Court steps with the Library of Congress in the background

Justices grant no new cases; Breyer reiterates doubts about constitutionality of capital punishment

Injury Insiders by Injury Insiders
May 23, 2022
in Premises Liability
0

You might also like

Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, May 16

Announcement of opinions for Wednesday, April 17

April 17, 2024
501940

Bet Gordon Ramsey Feels Like An Idiot Sandwich For Letting This Happen To His Pub

April 16, 2024

[ad_1]

SCOTUS NEWS


By Amy Howe

on May 23, 2022
at 12:56 pm

Supreme Court steps with the Library of Congress in the background

The Supreme Court on Monday morning issued orders from the justices’ private conference last week. The court did not add any new cases to its docket for the 2022-23 term, nor did it seek the views of the federal government on any pending petitions. But the justices denied review in the case of an Arizona inmate who was first sentenced to death in 1977, prompting Justice Stephen Breyer – who is retiring this summer – to once again express his concern about the constitutionality of such long stays on death row.

The inmate, Joe Clarence Smith, was originally sentenced to death more than 44 years ago; his death sentences were then twice vacated – in 1979 and 1999 – and reinstated. One of the longest-serving death-row inmates in the country, Smith has spent virtually all of his time in prison in solitary confinement, Breyer noted in a two-page statement regarding the court’s decision to deny review in Smith’s case.

The Supreme Court has “said that the uncertainty of waiting in prison under threat of execution for just four weeks is ‘one of the most horrible feelings’” that someone can experience, Breyer observed. Moreover, he added, “[y]ears on end of near-total isolation exact a terrible price.” Here, Breyer stressed, Smith “has been subjected to those conditions, not for four weeks, but for four decades.” In this case, Breyer conceded, procedural issues “make it difficult for us to grant” review. (The state argued in opposing review that Smith should have brought his challenge to the constitutionality of his execution under federal habeas corpus law, rather than as a federal civil rights claim.) But Breyer wrote that he continues “to believe that the excessive length of time that Smith and others have spent on death row awaiting execution raises serious doubts about the constitutionality of the death penalty as it is currently administered.”

No other justices signed onto Breyer’s statement.

The justices’ next private conference is scheduled for Thursday, May 26; orders from that conference will be released on Tuesday, May 31.

This article was originally published at Howe on the Court. 

[ad_2]

Injury Insiders

Injury Insiders

Next Post
Illinois State Police announce lateral training program with added incentives to attract candidates

Illinois State Police announce lateral training program with added incentives to attract candidates

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.