Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
No Result
View All Result
Abortion Legislation

All That And The Supreme Court Still Has No Idea Who Leaked The Dobbs Decision

Injury Insiders by Injury Insiders
January 19, 2023
in Premises Liability
0

[ad_1]

Abortion LegislationThe Supreme Court has finally released the results of its months-long investigation into the leaked draft opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health — the case overturning the right to reproductive freedom in this country. And let me cut directly to the chase — it’s basically a giant shrug emoji.

Specifically, the Court said, “it is not possible to determine the identity of any individual who may have disclosed the document or how the draft opinion ended up with Politico. No one confessed to publicly disclosing the document and none of the available forensic and other evidence provided a basis for identifying any individual as the source of the document.”

You might also like

Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, May 16

Announcement of opinions for Wednesday, April 17

April 17, 2024
501940

Bet Gordon Ramsey Feels Like An Idiot Sandwich For Letting This Happen To His Pub

April 16, 2024

Which is at least consistent with other recent Supreme Court investigations, even if it took a lot longer to get there.

You’ll recall, shortly after the leaked draft decision, getting to the heart of the leak seemed to be the focus for many in the legal industry — even in the face of a curtailment of rights that has had disastrous ramifications across the nation.

The report seems to suggest the scope of the investigation was limited to Court employees. Specifically noting, “The investigation focused on Court personnel – temporary (law clerks) and permanent employees – who had or may have had access to the draft opinion during the period from the initial circulation until the publication by Politico.”

Whether the “employees” who were subjected to the investigation includes the Justices themselves remains unclear, and the speculation amongst legal industry commentators is that the Nine were not included in the search for the leaker — and it certainly doesn’t include any of their spouses.

Is this right? Do the justices not count as “Court personnel” or “permanent employees?”

Because it’s utterly ridiculous to conduct an investigation that excludes nine prime suspects. https://t.co/R4j2tOHOe1

— Ian Millhiser (@imillhiser) January 19, 2023

So some of the favorite guesses as to the identity of the leaker remain apparently uninvestigated. Which probably increases those odds.

This may not be a particularly satisfying result, but was very predictable.

I told everybody, from the very beginning, that if the Dobbs leaker turned out to be a Republican, the Supreme Court would somehow never find who did it.

Welp, the report’s out and, what do you know, they don’t know who did it.

— Elie Mystal (@ElieNYC) January 19, 2023

Unfortunately, this also means the Dobbs leak will continue to be a favorite talking point for the right. It’s easier for them to talk about a boogey man leaker than the rising maternal and infant death rates linked to a dearth of reproductive health choices.


Kathryn Rubino is a Senior Editor at Above the Law, host of The Jabot podcast, and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. AtL tipsters are the best, so please connect with her. Feel free to email her with any tips, questions, or comments and follow her on Twitter @Kathryn1 or Mastodon @Kathryn1@mastodon.social.



[ad_2]

Injury Insiders

Injury Insiders

Next Post
Arizona gas station clerk

Arizona gas station clerk shoots armed robbery suspect who threatened customer with gun – Law Officer

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.