Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
No Result
View All Result
lady-justice-g9a1c9e23d_1920

SCOTUS Is Hearing Arguments Against Section 230. Everyone Else Is Hearing How Unprepared The Plaintiffs Are

Injury Insiders by Injury Insiders
February 21, 2023
in Premises Liability
0

[ad_1]

lady-justice-g9a1c9e23d_1920You ever come across the thumbnail of a recommended video and ask yourself why and how something like that could even be on the platform? Well, the internet’s liability ward — Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, is in the hotseat. Oral arguments that will determine the fate of the protections started today; the outcome will impact major content hosting sites like YouTube, Twitch, and Google.

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday began hearing arguments in a major case that could weaken a legal shield that protects internet companies from a wide array of lawsuits in a dispute involving YouTube and the family of an American student fatally shot in a 2015 rampage by Islamist militants in Paris.

The justices were considering an appeal by the family of Nohemi Gonzalez, a 23-year-old student at California State University, Long Beach who was studying in France, of a lower court’s dismissal of a lawsuit against Google LLC-owned YouTube. Google and YouTube are part of Alphabet Inc.

Put simply, it’s a high profile case and a bunch of people are giving their thoughts on the matter. Not all of them are flattering.

You might also like

Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, May 16

Announcement of opinions for Wednesday, April 17

April 17, 2024
501940

Bet Gordon Ramsey Feels Like An Idiot Sandwich For Letting This Happen To His Pub

April 16, 2024

the fact that both justice thomas & justice alito sound skeptical of petitioner’s theory for narrowing section 230 is … a pretty bad sign for the efforts to narrow section 230.

— Leah Litman (@LeahLitman) February 21, 2023

Just came out of the section 230 Gonzalez v. Google argument. Don’t think I’ve seen party’s lawyers do more damage to their own cases in a long time —

— Tim Wu (@superwuster) February 21, 2023

Someone should have taken the time to behoove counsel to maybe be a little bit more familiar with the subject material before heading to the Highest Court:

Jesus Christ this lawyer trying to dismantle section 230 thinks the thumbnails in YouTube videos are created by YouTube and not the users lmao

— Back From the Dead Fed🗽🌐🏳️‍🌈 🇺🇦 (@fedtanyl) February 21, 2023

Day 1 or not, you should keep your ear to the ground for developments as time passes. The ruling could have unforeseen consequences for your late night doom scrolling:

We will be sure to keep you updated as the story develops. Hopefully the lawyers will be a little more prepared on Day 2.

U.S. Supreme Court Begins Hearing Challenge To Internet Firms’ Legal Shield [Reuters]


Chris Williams became a social media manager and assistant editor for Above the Law in June 2021. Prior to joining the staff, he moonlighted as a minor Memelord™ in the Facebook group Law School Memes for Edgy T14s.  He endured Missouri long enough to graduate from Washington University in St. Louis School of Law. He is a former boatbuilder who cannot swim, a published author on critical race theory, philosophy, and humor, and has a love for cycling that occasionally annoys his peers. You can reach him by email at cwilliams@abovethelaw.com and by tweet at @WritesForRent.



[ad_2]

Injury Insiders

Injury Insiders

Next Post
PBMs Come Under Fire During Senate Hearing

PBMs Come Under Fire During Senate Hearing

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.