Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
No Result
View All Result
Supreme Court SCOTUS by David Lat

SCOTUS Rules Against Compelled Speech. The Breakdown Is Definitely Worth Talking About Though.

Injury Insiders by Injury Insiders
May 31, 2022
in Premises Liability
0

[ad_1]

Supreme Court SCOTUS by David Lat

The U.S. Supreme Court (Photo by David Lat).

I don’t even think Nate Silver saw this coming. The Texas law that manipulates viewpoint discrimination to prevent popular social media sites from taking down anything ranging from Uncle Billy Bob’s rant on Mexicans to a live stream of a killing spree has seen its day in the Supreme Court. And it has been blocked. Kind of.

You might also like

Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, May 16

Announcement of opinions for Wednesday, April 17

April 17, 2024
501940

Bet Gordon Ramsey Feels Like An Idiot Sandwich For Letting This Happen To His Pub

April 16, 2024

The court’s brief order was unsigned and gave no reasons, which is typical when the justices act on emergency applications. The order was not the last word in the case, which is pending before a federal appeals court and may return to the Supreme Court.

As thankful as I am for the result, you gotta wonder about the make up of this 5-4.

The five justices who blocked the law: Roberts, Kavanaugh, Barrett, Sotomayor, Breyer.

— Mark Joseph Stern (@mjs_DC) May 31, 2022

It’s also important to note that this decision is bigger than protecting a robust First Amendment. It also signals a turn in how the shadow docket’s use is justified.

To be clear: That’s how I imagine Kagan viewed this case. I personally think the majority obviously got it right. If there were ever an occasion to lift a lower court stay on the shadow docket, it was this. The law is an outrageous affront to free speech. https://t.co/5QehXd9ser

— Mark Joseph Stern (@mjs_DC) May 31, 2022

This is unlikely to be the last we see of either this law or laws like it. Like it or not, I think that Alito is tapped into the mood of the moment.

“This application concerns issues of great importance that will plainly merit this court’s review,” he wrote. “Social media platforms have transformed the way people communicate with each other and obtain news. At issue is a groundbreaking Texas law that addresses the power of dominant social media corporations to shape public discussion of the important issues of the day.”

I sure do hope the “shaping” SCOTUS inevitably ends up deciding on doesn’t make it easier for foreign countries to influence our elections and stoke the flames of race war.

Supreme Court Blocks Texas Law Regulating Social Media Platforms [NYT]


Chris Williams became a social media manager and assistant editor for Above the Law in June 2021. Prior to joining the staff, he moonlighted as a minor Memelord™ in the Facebook group Law School Memes for Edgy T14s.  He endured Missouri long enough to graduate from Washington University in St. Louis School of Law. He is a former boatbuilder who cannot swim, a published author on critical race theory, philosophy, and humor, and has a love for cycling that occasionally annoys his peers. You can reach him by email at cwilliams@abovethelaw.com and by tweet at @WritesForRent.



[ad_2]

Injury Insiders

Injury Insiders

Next Post

The Most Obvious Biglaw Verdict — See Also

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.