Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
No Result
View All Result
Some BigLaw firms decline to pay for Twitter check marks, while SCOTUSblog takes a stand

Some BigLaw firms decline to pay for Twitter check marks, while SCOTUSblog takes a stand

Injury Insiders by Injury Insiders
April 26, 2023
in Premises Liability
0

[ad_1]

  1. Home
  2. Daily News
  3. Some BigLaw firms decline to pay for Twitter…

Legal Marketing & Consulting

Some BigLaw firms decline to pay for Twitter check marks, while SCOTUSblog takes a stand

By Debra Cassens Weiss

April 26, 2023, 11:22 am CDT

Out of 17 top law firms that had free blue check marks from Twitter, only three have apparently paid to keep them, according to a review by Reuters.

Law firms that paid for the privilege of verification are Hogan Lovells, Holland & Knight and Vinson & Elkins, the article reports. But 14 others did not have check marks at the time that Reuters last checked. They included DLA Piper, Norton Rose Fulbright, Greenberg Traurig and Weil, Gotshal & Manges.

SCOTUSblog went further than the no-check-mark holdouts, announcing in an April 20 tweet that it is leaving the social media website.

“Bye, Twitter,” SCOTUSblog’s post read. “The tipping point was having to pay for verification, when we feel we add a lot of value. We also feel solidarity with NPR and share concerns about Twitter’s direction. You can find us on the blog and TikTok. If we join another platform, we’ll send word here.”

The price for a blue check mark starts at $8 per month or $84 per year. Verified organizations can get a gold check mark for $1,000 per month.

A Hogan Lovells spokesperson told Reuters that the blue check mark carries benefits that include analytics, data and a more secure two-factor authentication.

Some lawyers with large Twitter followings have elected to pay for the check mark. They include Preet Bharara, a former U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York; Neal Katyal, a partner at Hogan Lovells and a former acting U.S. solicitor general; John Quinn, founder of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan; Kannon Shanmugam, an appellate chair for Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison; and Ted Frank, a class action watchdog and director at the Hamilton Lincoln Law Institute.

The ABA Journal does not have a blue check mark.

Reuters contacted Twitter—which has laid off its communications staff members—for comment. Reuters received an auto reply with a poop emoji.

See also:

ABAJournal.com: “Would Twitter get Section 230 immunity in lawsuits filed over fake tweets with blue check marks?”



[ad_2]

You might also like

Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, May 16

Announcement of opinions for Wednesday, April 17

April 17, 2024
501940

Bet Gordon Ramsey Feels Like An Idiot Sandwich For Letting This Happen To His Pub

April 16, 2024
Injury Insiders

Injury Insiders

Next Post
People carrying money they've been awarded

ABE's annual grant program sends $300K to 12 innovative projects

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.