Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
No Result
View All Result
Senate Judiciary Holds Hearing on Supreme Court Ethics Amid Clarence Thomas Scandal

Senate Judiciary Holds Hearing on Supreme Court Ethics Amid Clarence Thomas Scandal

Injury Insiders by Injury Insiders
May 2, 2023
in Civil Rights
0

[ad_1]

Chief Justice John Roberts is doubling down on his claim that the U.S. Supreme Court needs no ethics reforms in the wake of bombshell reports that at least two justices have engaged in what some consider corruption.

Late Monday afternoon, in a letter to Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats (below), the Chief Justice revealed the Statement on Ethics Principles and Practices he had sent as proof of his justices’ dedication to ethics, which was adopted unanimously, had been signed the very day he sent it to Chairman Dick Durbin: April 25.

He also revealed that the last time Supreme Court justices had adopted a statement on ethics was 30 years ago, in 1993. While Supreme Court justices have a lifetime appointment, that would mean that only Justice Clarence Thomas had signed onto the code of ethics before last week. Coincidentally, Justice Thomas is the justice most of the allegations of corruption have centered on, although Justice Neil Gorsuch’s failure to reveal that a law firm chief had purchased land from him is attracting ethical concerns, and the Chief Justice is facing public scrutiny after it was revealed his wife has made over $10 million by placing attorneys into law firms, some of which have business before the Supreme Court.

Defending the justices’ actions, Chief Justice Roberts told Chairman Durbin and the Senate Judiciary Democrats that “Justices consult a wide variety of guidance on ethics issues, including statutes, judicial opinions, advice from Judicial Conference Committees and the Court’s Legal Office, scholarly commentary, and historical practice, among other sources.”

READ MORE: ‘Platforming an Insurrectionist’: CNN Smacked Down After Announcing Trump to Appear in ‘Presidential Town Hall’

That may be true, but according to reporting from ProPublica, Justice Thomas claimed he had consulted with fellow Justices and others when he first joined the court in 1991 and decided he was under no obligation to report on his annual financial disclose forms that over the past 20 years or so billionaire Harlan Crow had provided possibly millions of dollars worth of luxury, all-expenses-paid travel, vacations, food, lodging, and clothing, and even purchased his mother’s house, where she now lives rent free.

On Tuesday the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing on ethics reform for the Supreme Court.

Chairman Durbin had invited the Chief Justice to attend, or send a justice of his choosing in his place, but Roberts refused.

Tuesday’s hearing begins at 10 AM ET. You can watch it live here.

READ MORE: Tacopina Requests Mistrial on Multiple Grounds, Including Judge Would Not Let Him Explain to Jury Why His Table Is Bigger

The Justice’s latest intransigence comes after Justice Alito gave what many saw as a damning interview last week to Rupert Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal. During that interview he said he believes he knows who leaked the draft copy of his ruling in the Dobbs case last year, which overturned the decades-old Roe v. Wade decision that found women have a constitutional right to abortion. And he insists it was not a conservative.

U.S Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) on Monday blasted Alito: “Right, this is appropriate judicial behavior, to publicly blame the non-FedSoc side of the Court for his opinion leak without a shred of proof.”

Read the Chief Justice’s letter below or at this link.

NEWS: Chief Justice Roberts has responded to our letter asking questions about the Statement on Ethics Principles he sent us last week.

These answers further highlight the need for meaningful Supreme Court ethics reform, which the Committee will discuss at our hearing tomorrow. pic.twitter.com/K7R8FeLMvs

— Senate Judiciary Committee (@JudiciaryDems) May 1, 2023

Image via Shutterstock



[ad_2]

You might also like

SCOTUS Rules in Favor of Anti-LGBTQ Business Owner

SCOTUS Justices Appear to Want to Toss Obstruction Charges Against Some J6 Defendants: Experts

April 16, 2024
Three people standing outside the door of a group home

Group Homes for People with Disabilities are Harbors for Abuse – UAB Institute for Human Rights Blog

April 16, 2024
Injury Insiders

Injury Insiders

Next Post
Are We Trying to Eliminate Stress in Police Training? – Law Officer

Police recruit dies at training academy – Law Officer

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.