Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
No Result
View All Result
‘What You’re Saying Just Doesn’t Make Sense’: CNN’s Dana Bash Cuts Off Jim Jordan’s Trump-Defending Rant

‘What You’re Saying Just Doesn’t Make Sense’: CNN’s Dana Bash Cuts Off Jim Jordan’s Trump-Defending Rant

Injury Insiders by Injury Insiders
June 11, 2023
in Civil Rights
0

[ad_1]

During an extensive interview most notable for Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) refusing to stop talking and allowing host Dana Bash to fact-check him, the CNN host was finally forced to cut off the conservative lawmaker and point out he was rambling instead of answering her questions.

You might also like

SCOTUS Rules in Favor of Anti-LGBTQ Business Owner

SCOTUS Justices Appear to Want to Toss Obstruction Charges Against Some J6 Defendants: Experts

April 16, 2024
Three people standing outside the door of a group home

Group Homes for People with Disabilities are Harbors for Abuse – UAB Institute for Human Rights Blog

April 16, 2024

Asked on to discuss the 37-count federal indictment that former president Donald Trump is facing, Jordan ranted about the politicization of the Department of Justice — a central theme of hearings in the House Judiciary Committee he heads — and then launched into diatribes about former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Pressed about a Trump admission on a recently revealed tape that he possessed sensitive documents that he had not declassified — a central part of the DOJ’s case — Jordan stated, “Not if he declassified it when he was President of the United States, for goodness’ sake.”

“He is saying point blank in this audio tape he did not declassify it,” Bash interjected. “What you’re saying just doesn’t make sense on its face.”

“Dana, what this truly is, Dana, is an affront to the rule of law,” Jordan attempted.

“It is an affront to the consistent application of the law,” he continued. “You have Secretary Clinton who had classified material on a server. She was not President of the United States. She was Secretary Clinton. You have that happen and nothing happens to her.”

“The only one indicted is the one who was president and did it the right way,” he later insisted. “Oh, my goodness. That is what the American people see.”

Watch a portion of the interview below or at the link:

 

The post ‘What You’re Saying Just Doesn’t Make Sense’: CNN’s Dana Bash Cuts Off Jim Jordan’s Trump-Defending Rant appeared first on The New Civil Rights Movement.

[ad_2]

Injury Insiders

Injury Insiders

Next Post
Unabomber Ted Kaczynski reportedly committed suicide – Law Officer

Unabomber Ted Kaczynski reportedly committed suicide – Law Officer

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.