Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
No Result
View All Result
email fail palm Shocked young woman looking at laptop screen.

State Supreme Court Justice Offers His Thoughts On Women’s Health… Definitely Should Not Have Offered Thoughts On Women’s Health

Injury Insiders by Injury Insiders
June 23, 2023
in Premises Liability
0

[ad_1]

email fail palm Shocked young woman looking at laptop screen.Lawyers offer a lot of legal writing advice, but the best might be “discretion is the better part of valor.” In other words, “maybe don’t write down every thought that comes into your head.” Usually this advice is aimed at keeping filings within page limits, but it’s surprisingly good advice even for short pieces.

Like a 13-word state supreme court concurrence that definitely should never have been written.

You might also like

Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, May 16

Announcement of opinions for Wednesday, April 17

April 17, 2024
501940

Bet Gordon Ramsey Feels Like An Idiot Sandwich For Letting This Happen To His Pub

April 16, 2024

Justice Jefferson Hughes of the Louisiana Supreme Court, sorry, le Cour suprême de Louisiane couldn’t pass up lending his two cents to a recent opinion about expert witness limits. And his two cents focused on the importance of telling women “Don’t have sex!” As noted by attorney Morgan Lamandre on Twitter, “What has happened to the judiciary?!”

Screenshot 2023-06-22 at 11.00.21 PM

You’d be forgiven for thinking this is some sort of abstinence-only nonsense from a state that all but bans abortion. That’s certainly the first thought most folks had when a male justice wrote sex advice in a context-free concurrence about OB/GYN care. However, in reality Justice Hughes is trying to make a fair point.

But still not an advisable one.

It seems that this lawsuit involves a couple who suffered complications from having sex during an ectopic pregnancy. While the majority opinion kicks the case back down to allow the defendant clinic the opportunity to call more witnesses, Justice Hughes seems to be expressing frustration that the defendants used medical jargon when they could’ve just said “don’t have sex,” with or without an exclamation point.

Hmm… I wonder why people might feel leery about using frank language to discuss sex in a state rushing to police porn?

While the message is fair, the blunt two-line concurrence reads as a hissy fit, reflecting poorly on the justice’s temperament and overall professionalism. Also, why in the world is he mouthing off about the merits of the case at all? The question before the court is about expert witnesses, inserting his thoughts about the substance of the allegations feels inappropriate at this juncture.

Maybe sit this one out, mon ami.


HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.



[ad_2]

Injury Insiders

Injury Insiders

Next Post
Critics and Adoptees Blast Marjorie Taylor Greene's Claim a Stepmom Is 'Not a Mother'

Some in House Freedom Caucus Want to Boot Marjorie Taylor Greene After Adding New Members: Report

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.