Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
No Result
View All Result
Federal judge rules Oklahoma’s lethal injection protocol not ‘cruel, unusual’ – Law Officer

Federal judge rules Oklahoma’s lethal injection protocol not ‘cruel, unusual’ – Law Officer

Injury Insiders by Injury Insiders
June 7, 2022
in Police Misconduct
0

You might also like

Dozens of migrants were caught on camera jumping off a speed boat that came ashore a California beach over the weekend and running into the nearby city.

Nearly two dozen migrants hit the beach running after speedboat motors ashore in California – Law Officer

April 16, 2024
Blue Trauma Syndrome 2024 - Cops Alive

Blue Trauma Syndrome 2024 – Cops Alive

April 16, 2024

[ad_1]

Share and speak up for justice, law & order…

OKLAHOMA – A federal judge rejected a legal challenge on Monday to Oklahoma’s execution protocol. The ruling said the state does not violate a constitutional prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.

U.S. District Judge Stephen Friot issued the ruling after inmates specifically complained that the sedative midazolam — the first drug in the three-drug process — doesn’t work. They claim they will feel extreme pain as the second and third drugs take effect, reported The Oklahoman.

Judge Friot disagreed with the claims, finding it highly probable that an inmate will feel no pain “within in a very short time after the midazolam is pushed.”

The ruling clears the way for the state to carry out as many as 28 executions by lethal injection over the next two years, according to the news outlet.

Oklahoma’s current protocol involves the intravenous injection of midazolam, followed by a paralytic, vecuronium bromide, and then the heart-stopping drug potassium chloride.

Earlier this year, the judge heard conflicting testimony during a six-day trial in Oklahoma City federal court.

“The evidence persuades the court, and not by a small margin, that even though midazolam is not the drug of choice for maintaining prolonged deep anesthesia, it can be relied upon, as used in the Oklahoma execution protocol, to render the inmate insensate to pain for the few minutes required to complete the execution,” he wrote in his 43-page ruling, the Oklahoman reported.

According to Judge Friot, the U.S. Supreme Court requires inmates to show that a challenged execution method “is sure or very likely to cause serious illness and needless suffering.”

The inmates “have fallen well short of clearing the bar set by the Supreme Court,” he concluded.

Finally, the judge pointed out in his conclusions that the Supreme Court has said an inmate is not guaranteed a painless death and that courts “do not sit as boards of inquiry charged with determining best practices for executions.”

Share and speak up for justice, law & order…



[ad_2]

Injury Insiders

Injury Insiders

Next Post
Police officers pose as TV news crew to end hostage situation

Police officers pose as TV news crew to end hostage situation

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.