[ad_1]
* In bothsideism push, conservatives are hyping that Sotomayor’s book tour makes hosts purchase copies. Putting aside that this is how book tours work everywhere, the complaint underscores that Alito and Thomas defenders think the problem is “justices making money” as opposed to “justices getting paid by parties trying to influence the judges.” [AP]
* Lawsuit brought against Idaho’s abortion travel ban. [Law.com]
* It’s not just law firms forcing people back to in-person work just because old partners feel lonely. Judges are willing to let the wheels of justice grind if it gives them some playmates throughout the day. [New York Law Journal]
* “Judges Confused by Supreme Court’s Historical Test for Gun Laws.” It can be confusing if you get tripped up on the “historical” part. But it’s really easy once you ignore all the actual history and only use the gun manufacturer fan fiction account in Bruen. [Bloomberg Law News]
* Mainstream media asking snide questions about antitrust law after Microsoft ruling. [NY Times]
* Judge Newman’s battle with the rest of the Federal Circuit now has a mediator. [Law360]
The post Morning Docket: 07.12.23 appeared first on Above the Law.
[ad_2]
