Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
No Result
View All Result
Liz Cheney Mocks 'Apparently Inebriated Rudy Giuliani' – and Shows He Was Behind False Claim of Trump Victory

Liz Cheney Mocks ‘Apparently Inebriated Rudy Giuliani’ – and Shows He Was Behind False Claim of Trump Victory

Injury Insiders by Injury Insiders
June 13, 2022
in Civil Rights
0

[ad_1]

The second televised public hearing of the House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack begins at 10:30 AM ET Monday and two former federal prosecutors have weighed in to discuss what they think is important.

Barb McQuade, the well-known MSNBC/NBC News legal analyst who served as a U.S. Attorney from 2010 to 2017 is a University of Michigan law professor.

“In today’s hearing, I will be listening for evidence of [Donald] Trump’s knowledge that he lost the election, an essential element for potential fraud crimes relating to his efforts to challenge the outcome,” McQuade says on Twitter.

She points to this from The Guardian’s Hugo Lowell:

New: Jan. 6 committee member Elaine Luria tells CNN: “What we’ll hear will show that in the conversations he knew privately that he had lost, yet he decided to go out into the public and continue to say that he won.”

— Hugo Lowell (@hugolowell) June 13, 2022

McQuade, who among other high-profile cases secured the conviction of Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick for public corruption, makes her case for what the Dept. of Justice needs to do after the “J6C,” January 6 Committee’s hearing:

“While it’s important for J6C to tell the whole story, a criminal case could be as simple as this: Trump knew he lost the election and pressured Pence to steal it for him. That’s conspiracy to defraud US, 18 USC 371, and conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, 18 USC 1512.”

Daniel Goldman is a former Asst. U.S. Attorney at the Southern District of New York and was the lead counsel for the House’s impeachment of Donald Trump. He comes at the issue from a different angle.

He says Trump “did not and does not reasonably believe the there was election fraud,” which could put. a hole in McQuade’s case, if not for his next sentence: “Under the doctrine of conscious avoidance, he cannot put his head in the sand to avoid reality.”

Donald Trump did not and does not reasonably believe the there was election fraud. Under the doctrine of conscious avoidance, he cannot put his head in the sand to avoid reality.

The “delusional sociopath” defense (h/t @chrislhayes) would not hold up in a criminal trial.

— Daniel Goldman (@danielsgoldman) June 13, 2022

Meanwhile, the House Select Committee is facing another hurdle: former Trump campaign manager Bill Stepien, who was to be a star witness at Monday morning’s televised hearing, has canceled, reportedly due to a “family emergency.”

 



[ad_2]

You might also like

SCOTUS Rules in Favor of Anti-LGBTQ Business Owner

SCOTUS Justices Appear to Want to Toss Obstruction Charges Against Some J6 Defendants: Experts

April 16, 2024
Three people standing outside the door of a group home

Group Homes for People with Disabilities are Harbors for Abuse – UAB Institute for Human Rights Blog

April 16, 2024
Injury Insiders

Injury Insiders

Next Post
In ideologically scrambled ruling, court rejects double-jeopardy claim from man who was prosecuted twice

In ideologically scrambled ruling, court rejects double-jeopardy claim from man who was prosecuted twice

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.