Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
No Result
View All Result
Samuel Alito frown

Remember That New Supreme Court Ethics Code? Sam Alito Doesn’t.

Injury Insiders by Injury Insiders
January 17, 2024
in Premises Liability
0

[ad_1]

Samuel Alito frown

(Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

After weathering revelation after revelation about Clarence Thomas taking undisclosed gifts from wealthy donors and Sam Alito taking private jets to luxury resorts (and then downplaying his relationship to the litigant who flew him there, unaware that Above the Law covered them fawning all over each other in 2009), the Supreme Court had an ethics problem and Chief Justice Roberts committed to solving it. And by “committed,” he meant getting his colleagues to sign perfunctory rehash of the ethical rules that bind lower court judges — lightly edited to protect the justices from having to give up some of their favorite boondoggles, of course.

You might also like

Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, May 16

Announcement of opinions for Wednesday, April 17

April 17, 2024
501940

Bet Gordon Ramsey Feels Like An Idiot Sandwich For Letting This Happen To His Pub

April 16, 2024

One of the most important goals of the ethics code was developing a consistent and transparent recusal policy. Dating back to past centuries — cue the Originalism music — the recusal obligation carried an expectation that the justice would explain the reason for recusal. As soon as the Chief hinted at an ethical code, Justice Kagan began including explanations for her recusals, ultimately becoming the first to cite the new, much-ballyhooed (by Roberts anyway) ethical code in a recusal.

This week, the Court saw more recusals and a distinct gap in ethical execution.

In limited defense of Alito, the code only requires the recusing justice to opt out if any of the 3B conditions are meant. And while providing transparency is the clear purpose of the rule and in accord with historical precedent, the code failed to set out “and you will identify your reason for disqualification.”

It’s probably for an entirely benign reason. But if he starts identifying the reason for his recusals here, people are going to expect them the next time a billionaire litigant throws him a birthday party, so best practice is definitely to embrace the appearance of impropriety!


HeadshotJoe Patrice is a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free to email any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him on Twitter if you’re interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.



[ad_2]

Injury Insiders

Injury Insiders

Next Post
"mostbet Uz Узбекистан Букмекер, Казино, Приложение

"mostbet Uz Узбекистан Букмекер, Казино, Приложение

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.