Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
No Result
View All Result
Anna Henderson

UK: employers at risk of paying more than statutory cap on unfair dismissal compensatory awards in some cases

Injury Insiders by Injury Insiders
July 1, 2022
in Worker's Compensation
0

[ad_1]

Employers face paying more than the statutory cap for unfair dismissal compensation in some cases, following a ruling of the Scottish EAT in Dafiaghor-Olomu v Community Integrated Care.  

The statutory cap on unfair dismissal compensatory awards (the lower of 52 weeks’ pay and, currently, £93,878) applies to the overall assessment of compensation after ‘taking into account’ any payment made by the employer to the employee in respect of the subject matter of the claim.  The Scottish EAT has ruled that, where a compensatory award ordered by the tribunal was paid by the employer but the employee then appealed the remedy, and at the second remedies hearing the tribunal calculated compensation at a higher amount well above the cap, the original sum paid should be deducted before applying the statutory cap.  The employer argued that the cap should be applied first and the amount already paid then set off;  the EAT had sympathy for the employer’s position but felt constrained by the statutory wording to reject this argument.  As a result, the employer ended up paying the statutory cap plus the amount of the initial award.

Absent this decision being overturned or legislative reform, employers can therefore be penalised if they pay a first award promptly, only for it to be successfully appealed.  Where the claimant could potentially be awarded loss significantly in excess of the statutory cap, employers may wish to consider not paying the original award within the required 14 days and seeking a stay of any enforcement proceedings pending appeal.  However, interest would continue to be payable (currently at 8% pa) from the day after the original decision.

Anna Henderson

You might also like

eeoc

EEOC Releases Final Rule Implementing Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (US)

April 16, 2024
MLB players need a history lesson on labor relations in sports: Employment & Labor Insider

Implications of NLRB Regional Office decision on Dartmouth basketball players: Employment & Labor Insider

April 16, 2024


[ad_2]

Injury Insiders

Injury Insiders

Next Post
Rudy Giuliani Seems A Little Tense — See Also

That Woman Wasn't Even In The Room When Rudy Asked For That Pardon He Never Asked For!

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.