[ad_1]
Asked and Answered
Following her experiences, former law clerk seeks support for the Judiciary Accountability Act
Image from Shutterstock.
Aliza Shatzman didn’t realize that federal judicial employees are not protected by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. That is until the judge she worked for in 2020 ended her clerkship early—for reasons that she thinks were due to gender discrimination.
She was also unaware that federal court clerks are at-will employees. Shatzman says the experience led to her co-founding the Legal Accountability Project, a nonprofit focused on helping law clerks have positive experiences. The organization plans to set up a clerkship reporting database and a database with the names of employment lawyers willing to represent federal clerks who need legal representation.
The group also supports the Judiciary Accountability Act, a federal bill that would extend protection of discrimination based on race, color religion and sex to judicial employees and would establish a special counsel to investigate allegations of workplace misconduct.
Shatzman spoke in March about her experience to the House Committee on the Judiciary, urging Congress to pass the act. In an August 2021 letter, the Judicial Conference of the United States opposed the act.
Send ideas for future episodes to ABA Journal Senior Writer Stephanie Francis Ward.
Want to listen on the go? Asked and Answered is available on several podcast listening services. Subscribe and never miss an episode.
Apple | Spotify | Google Play
.png)
This podcast was brought to you by our advertiser, LawPay. “Did you know that attorneys who accept online payments get paid 39 percent faster on average than those using traditional payment methods? With LawPay, the only payment solution offered through the ABA Advantage program, you can accept client payments online, via email, or in person—no equipment needed. Visit LawPay.com/podcast to sign up and get your first three months free. Trust the #1 payment solution for the legal industry—LawPay.”
[ad_2]
