Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct
No Result
View All Result
Writy.
No Result
View All Result

Justice Department urges court to stay out of Mar-a-Lago documents dispute

Injury Insiders by Injury Insiders
October 11, 2022
in Premises Liability
0

[ad_1]

EMERGENCY DOCKET


By Amy Howe

on Oct 11, 2022
at 7:48 pm

The Department of Justice headquarters

The Main Justice building in Washington, D.C. (Blvdone via Shutterstock)

The Biden administration on Tuesday urged the Supreme Court to reject former President Donald Trump’s request to reinstate a district judge’s order that would allow a special master to review about 100 classified documents seized from Trump’s home. The Justice Department called Judge Aileen Cannon’s order, which a federal appeals court put on hold last month, “unprecedented.”

You might also like

Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, May 16

Announcement of opinions for Wednesday, April 17

April 17, 2024
501940

Bet Gordon Ramsey Feels Like An Idiot Sandwich For Letting This Happen To His Pub

April 16, 2024

The FBI seized 11,000 documents, including over 100 marked as classified, in an Aug. 8 search of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida. After Cannon granted Trump’s request to appoint a special master to review the documents and barred the government from using any of the documents as part of a criminal investigation, the Justice Department appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit.

In an unsigned opinion on Sept. 21, a three-judge panel – which included two judges appointed by Trump – agreed to freeze two parts of Cannon’s order: one part requiring the DOJ to allow the special master to review the classified documents and another part barring the DOJ from using the classified documents in a criminal investigation.

Trump came to the Supreme Court last week, asking the justices to revive the portion of Cannon’s order that required the government to turn over the documents marked as classified.

In a 32-page filing, Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar argued that the justices should leave the 11th Circuit’s ruling, which she characterizes as a “modest partial stay,” in place. Trump has not even tried to explain, she noted, why he would be permanently injured – one criteria for emergency relief – if the special master does not have access to the classified documents for a short time.

And in any event, Prelogar continued, Trump also is not entitled to emergency relief because he has not shown that the court of appeals was clearly wrong in putting part of Cannon’s order on hold. Although Cannon appointed Senior U.S. District Judge Raymond Dearie, the special master, to determine whether any of the seized documents were protected by executive privilege or attorney-client privilege or belonged to Trump, Trump “has no plausible claim of privilege in or ownership of government records bearing classification markings,” Prelogar wrote.

Trump’s contention that the 11th Circuit lacked the power to block the special master’s review of the classified documents also falls short, Prelogar argued, for a variety of independent reasons – including that an order to turn over classified documents can be immediately reviewed, because otherwise the appeal of the order “will likely be futile once disclosure has occurred.” But in any event, Prelogar concluded, the court of appeals was not clearly wrong when it determined that it did have the power to intervene.

Trump’s legal team can file a response to the DOJ brief. Once it does, the court could act on his request at any time.

This article was originally published at Howe on the Court. 

[ad_2]

Injury Insiders

Injury Insiders

Next Post
Ex-Texas cop charged over shooting driver eating hamburger in McDonald's parking lot

Ex-Texas cop charged over shooting driver eating hamburger in McDonald's parking lot

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Mass Tort
  • Personal Injury
  • Civil Rights
  • Worker’s Compensation
  • Premises Liability
  • Police Misconduct

© 2022 injuryinsiders.com - All rights reserved by Injury Insiders.